<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T actually fares better than Verizon in latest tests&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetsteria.com/2009/12/07/att-actually-fares-better-than-verizon-in-latest-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetsteria.com/2009/12/07/att-actually-fares-better-than-verizon-in-latest-tests/</link>
	<description>All Things Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadgetsteria </title>
		<link>http://gadgetsteria.com/2009/12/07/att-actually-fares-better-than-verizon-in-latest-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadgetsteria </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetsteria.com/?p=18764#comment-3776</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;AT&amp;T actually fares better than Verizon in latest tests...? Read more at Gadgetsteria.com :http://bit.ly/70ew6r&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">AT&amp;T actually fares better than Verizon in latest tests&#8230;? Read more at Gadgetsteria.com :<a href="http://bit.ly/70ew6r" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/70ew6r</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gadgetsteria.com/2009/12/07/att-actually-fares-better-than-verizon-in-latest-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetsteria.com/?p=18764#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Over the last couple of weeks, I&#039;ve watched the commercials several times.  Unless I missed something, Verizon marketed themselves as &quot;more reliable&quot; and owning a larger overall 3G network.  I didn&#039;t hear any mentions of speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Over the last couple of weeks, I&#8217;ve watched the commercials several times.  Unless I missed something, Verizon marketed themselves as &#8220;more reliable&#8221; and owning a larger overall 3G network.  I didn&#8217;t hear any mentions of speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B.</title>
		<link>http://gadgetsteria.com/2009/12/07/att-actually-fares-better-than-verizon-in-latest-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>John B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetsteria.com/?p=18764#comment-2422</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Verizon ever claimed their network was faster. Their only goal was to tout their better overall national coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Verizon ever claimed their network was faster. Their only goal was to tout their better overall national coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 3/7 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 296/298 objects using disk: basic

Served from: gadgetsteria.com @ 2012-05-24 16:41:50 -->
