Archive for: network problems

iPhone problems? Could it be because AT&T doesn’t know how to configure their own network?

  • October 26, 2009 6:57 am

Many iPhone users on AT&T in the U.S. usually spend at least a small part of each day rationalizing why their coverage or network performance sucks so bad. Everything from hardware to network problems cross their minds as they desperately seek an answer. Many will claim that AT&T simply needs to add more towers as increased network load from increasingly dense cities puts an ever increasing load on each tower. But is that really the answer? Could be something as simple as an improperly configured network? Surely they must have that part down…right? Maybe not.

According to Brough Turner, a telecommunications employee since 1983, AT&T does in fact have an improperly configured network sighting examples of how ping times on AT&T are most often either really good or really bad with no real middle ground/grey area. More specifically, Brough Tuner states that “misconfigured buffers in their mobile core network” are the sole reason AT&T’s network sucks. Further supporting his hypothesis, IntoMobile states simple facts regarding population density in Shanghai whom back in 2007, had a staggering average of 13,400 people per square kilometer. That’s insane! Even still, Shanghai was only ranked as the 10th most densely populated city. Now take into account that a bulk of AT&T’s problems in the US occur in large cities where densities are sky high. Sky high on a national scale however, as globally speaking, the most densely populated U.S. city is that of Los Angeles with a paltry 2,700 people per square kilometer and a ranking of 90th place when population densities are concerned. As you can see, the problems here in the U.S. are a fraction of what China goes through, yet they somehow manage to keep their networks up and running without the ridiculous problems that plague us stateside.

So what is AT&T’s problem? It’s anybody’s guess. Does Turner’s hypothesis have any weight? Sure it does. But AT&T will deny any such issue and repeat the same “huge increase in demand line”. While true, you can only blame demand for so long before people begin questioning you as to why it’s taking so long to fix the issue at hand.

IntoMobile > Slashdot > Brough Turner

Image Source

AT&T claims network needs “more work” before iPhone tethering can be unlocked

  • October 8, 2009 9:07 am

While such news is nothing new, AT&T is still standing by previous statements made in regards to iPhone tethering — that is, that the network needs further work and upgrades before such a feature can launch successfully. Other examples of needed work were seen with the delay of MMS and VoIP apps on the iPhone, though, this past month and more recently this week have seen reversals on both stalemates. Tethering still remains a locked down feature however as in plain terms, their network simply can’t handle it. It’s worth mentioning that a vauge “sometime in 2009″ statement had been heard from Big Blue as to a release time frame for iPhone tethering. Currently however, that mystery date and comment have failed to materialize into anything worthwhile physical meaning our wait goes on…

I completely understand the basics of a free market economy and making a buck, but how bad is it that several months after the rest of the world gets iPhone tethering we here in the U.S. are still left without a single legitimate option and absolutely no timeline for any timely delivery. Such examples are prime reasons for Apple to drop this unholy matrimony and expand to other carriers. Such a move will give customers more choice and happier days. Not to mention, when a handful of people leave AT&T to get the iPhone on another carrier, AT&T’s network will see some much needed relief. While it’s not the exact outcome AT&T wants to see, it will none the less bring some stability to an overtaxed, underdeveloped network.

AppleInsider

Image Source

Would AT&T be more diverse, more reliable, and less crap without the iPhone?

  • September 3, 2009 12:05 pm

iphone-home

On my journey through my ever bloated RSS reader, I stumbled upon a post on Gearlog that really made me stop and think. I sit here day in and day out reading story after story with some tie to either Apple, the iPhone, or AT&T. More often than not, poor network performance is the center headline drawing me in. The fact that Apple’s Jesus phone is causing AT&T to stutter is an understatement. Heck, even major news publications such as the New York Times are starting to notice. One thing I don’t see is news from other iPhone carrying countries about their underdeveloped, under prepared iPhone carriers and the horrendous network coverage and speeds that plague U.S. users. While I’m sure they have their own problems here and there, the fact that it isn’t blowing up like it is stateside is disheartening.

Since picking up the iPhone, AT&T has released countless handsets that on paper, meet or surpass the iPhone in every way. Yet time and time again these handset launches go unnoticed and under the radar. The complete ecosystem Apple created between the iPhone, iTunes, and Macs is a monumental challenge for foes to overcome to say the least. Likewise, since the iPhone’s birth on Big Blue, many handsets didn’t even get a chance to go unnoticed. Handsets that without an iPhone would have been prime contenders. First, this shows just how far advanced the iPhone and its ecosystem is from the rest of the market. Two, it makes one stop and ask themselves: “What if AT&T never carried the iPhone..what if the iPhone never existed?”.